¶ … Olympics a Waste of Money?
Over the years, the Olympic Games have withered many trials including but not limited to boycotts, wars and poor organization. Further, there have been claims that the benefits derived from the Games do not justify the costs. In that regard, some continue to view the Olympic Games as a waste of money. Those of a similar opinion are convinced that the money 'wasted' in seeing the Olympics through would rather be used to help the poor. Despite the challenges as well as criticism that has been leveled against the Olympic Games over time, the relevance of the Games from both an economic and social perspective cannot be overstated.
Are the Olympics a Waste of Money?
In the words of Humphreys and Howard (2008), "sporting events produce two types of economic benefits: direct and indirect." In the opinion of the authors, direct economic benefits in this case include but they are not limited to the net spending by visitors/tourists who come to witness the event, improvements made on the locality's infrastructure, etc. Indirect benefits on the other hand according to the authors include enhanced advertising that rises the profile of the city hosting the events, etc. As the authors further note, the only difference between the Olympic Games and other games is the number of fans, participants as well as officials involved. Unlike other sporting events, the Olympic Games attract a significant number of participants and fans. In that regard, the economic benefits I identify above apply in the Olympics as well. Indeed, as Humphreys and Howard (2008)...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now